Saturday, April 11, 2015

Some New Directions in My Project on Cuban Digital Rhetorics

This passed week, I've had a number of conversations and discoveries that have really helped me further develop the digital humanities project I've been working on the past few months. In a brief conversation with Matt Frye about his own research he mentioned the term, "leapfrogging." "Leapfrogging" communicates the idea that areas that have not developed "stable" or "up-to-date" technological and economic infrastructures might rapidly move themselves forward through the adoption of contemporary systems without going through a series of intermediary steps of development. With purveyors of hardware, technology, telecommunications, etc. lining up to "update" Cuba's existing technological infrastructure in the wake of an agreement between President Obama and Raul Castro to relax trade and travel restrictions between the U.S. and Cuba,

Cuba purportedly stands to experience an unprecedented amount of growth in terms of material access, or at the very least an influx of material contexts in which users could perhaps own or operate digital technologies and participate as users on the Internet and Web 2.0. This "influx of material contexts" is very important to keep in mind given the various economic realities and debilitating restrictions imposed on Cuban citizens attempting to own or operate digital technologies regardless of the setting in which such use actually takes place. Indeed, according to a recent Bendixen & Amandi Poll for Univision Noticias - Fusion in collaboration with The Washington Post, it was reported that only 16% of Cubans living in Cuba have access to the Internet. And while these poll results might lead some to simply assume that Cubans living in Cuba as a whole would stand to benefit from a surge in material access, it is still important to keep in mind the manner in which the aforementioned economic realities and restrictions have tempered the use of digital technologies and the Internet in profoundly different ways for various populations.

In the past couple of years, Roots of Hope, an organization comprised of students and young professionals seeking to empower youth in Cuba to become authors of their own futures, have organized events in which computer programmers and coders from all over the globe are invited to explore the prospects for combating Internet restrictions in Cuba and to develop ideas, applications, and "innovative technology solutions" that speak directly to the existing hardware, literacy, and access limitations that serve as the foundation for the relationship between Cuba and technology.

These are very important contexts for me to consider as I move forward with my project in the digital humanities, in that they challenge me to re-consider the approach I am taking to the notion of digital rhetorics among Cubans living in Cuba. With all of these and more interested parties vying to enter the conversation around Cuba's digital and telecommunications future, I remain focused on how we might imagine and enact these futures in conversation with Cubans living in Cuba themselves.

2 comments:

  1. Mark,

    You bring up a really excellent point. The introduction of technology seems to carry a heavy weight and must be applied in a rather gentle manner for those who have had historically limited access, like, as you point out, Cuban citizens. I'm intrigued by the mission of Roots of Hope. I admire their ambition to examine Cuba's situation and integrate needed digital technologies into the lives of everyday people. I'm equally curious, though, what frame these designers will base their designs around. To clarify (and I think we've discussed this before, but I'm not entirely sure), I'm worried that these developers may use Western/Euro-American formats of communication that, because of cultural differences, won't prove as beneficial to those working with such technologies for the first time. Have you come across anything addressing this as you've researched? What have your findings been?

    Thanks for the post!

    Lacy

    ReplyDelete
  2. Mark,
    Your project is really falling during an exciting historical time for the interactions between our country and Cuba. I really like everything you're discussing in this post, and how it all helps to cultivate your project in new ways that directly correlate with current events. I agree with Lacy, Roots of Hope sounds awesome, I wonder if they'll extend their reach of participants to actual Cuban citizens, (I think it's great they're trying to do FOR them but wouldn't it be great if some Cubans had input to?). In addition, I really appreciate your discussion of material access, and how considerations between actual material access and theorized material access are very different things. Great post!
    Lucy

    ReplyDelete